Freies Politikforum für Demokraten und Anarchisten

palestina libera · Beiträge: 1665

'I saw Ariel Sharon murder 2 Palestinian toddlers in Lebanon'

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/i-saw-ariel-sharon-murder-2-palestinian-toddlers-in-lebanon-1.325540

Was sagte Zentralrat der Juden in Deutschland über Sharon

http://www.zentralratdjuden.de/de/article/4704.graumann-ariel-sharon-war-ein-held-israels.html

Der deutsche Außenminister Frank-Walter Steinmeier

"Scharon selbst würde heute auf eine Zweitstaatenlösung in Nahost hoffen und hätte die aktuellen Verhandlungen zwischen Palästinensern und Israelis unterstützt. "
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/beisetzung-israel-wuerdigt-scharon-und-warnt-hamas-vor-angriff-a-943178.html

Über Steinmeir Deklarationen .............

" Although Benjamin Netanyahu publicly opposed the ‘disengagement’ from Gaza in 2005, the same strategies are being implemented and continued by him. In this regard, it can be argued that Prime Minister Netanyahu is executing Sharon’s plan to create Greater Israel by continuing his expansionist policy of annexing East Jerusalem and the West Bank through the systematic development of Israeli settlements/colonies. Beneath the surface, the continuation and expansion of the Israeli settlements and the leverage they have given Israel in negotiations is why Ariel Sharon is really the “architect of modern Israel.”

Sharon’s objectives of annexing East Jerusalem and the West Bank, however, are not a view he shaped, they are part of an expansionist ideology widely held in the Israeli political establishment and popularly supported in Israeli society. He is merely the man who put together the strategy of doing it while appearing to pursue peace. In this context, it should come as no surprise just days before Sharon died, in late December 2013, that the Israeli government’s Ministerial Legislative Committee voted to annex the West Bank’s Jordan Valley, effectively insuring that the West Bank will barely have a border with Jordan and that most the West Bank will encircled by Israel.

Nor does Sharon’s death mean that Israel’s embrace of militarism has ended. Sharon is just one of many military leaders, like Shimon Peres, that have built Israel with war and around the military as the most important institution in Israel. To equate Ariel Sharon with Israel means that his death marks an end to a bloody history, when in reality the bloody history still continues with Netanyahu and Israel’s current leaders.

Since Sharon left office due to his coma, Israel attacked Lebanon in 2006, has launching multiple attacks on Gaza, conducted attacks on Syria, and repeatedly threatened to start wars against other countries. Tel Aviv’s leaders have always blamed Hamas for attacking Gaza, but it is important to note that they have done this while Israel continues its military operations and occupation in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, even though Fatah rules the West Bank and has insured that no real attacks have been launched against Israel for years. "

http://rt.com/op-edge/sharon-israel-palestina-netanyahu-566/